Read container codes, plates and visible damage at the gate, check what arithmetic can check, and leave the identity, the interchange receipt and the movement to a gate officer.
In aggregate the correction rate reads low. By slice it does not — night and low-sun lanes run at a multiple of the daylight rate on the same cameras. Nestack reports corrections by lane and condition, not only in total.
Slice performance — reported separately, not only in aggregateIllustrative example
Slice
Failure rate
Lift
Lift vs. threshold
Status
Night and low-sun lanes
8.2%
3.9×
Review
Rusted or overpainted boxes
5.0%
2.4×
Review
Licence-plate reads
3.2%
1.5×
Watch
Daylight portal lanes
1.7%
0.8×
Normal
Bar: correction-rate lift vs. daylight-portal baseline · scale 0–4.0× · tick marks the 2.0× review threshold2 of 4 slices over threshold
Evidence-linked improvement
The loop ends in a case, not a post-mortem
The cycle does not end in a post-mortem. It ends in a case the next release has to clear, and that suite is what the next gate movement is measured against.
Improvement cycle · five stagesSwitchback — the path turns at Improve and returns at Learn
01Detect
Officer corrections rise in one lane.
02Diagnose
The frame, the read and the movement record go back on the desk together until the cause narrows to one.
03Improve
Each change carries a version and the movements that forced it.
04Verify
Release waits on the affected cases going green again.
05Learn
The case is kept for good, and the gate rules are rewritten.
Learn → DetectThe return edge. The next read meets a suite that just got longer.
Typical build scope
Twelve workstreams across six weeks
The build scope read against the delivery timeline. Week structure follows the six-week plan — discovery, cameras, read workflow, evaluation, integration, then production validation and handover.
WorkstreamWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6
01Gate and yard workflow discovery and boundary definition.
02Camera, lane and terminal system review.
03Check-digit, structural and appointment rule mapping.
04Frame ingestion and read normalisation.
05Character extraction and check logic.
06Confidence scoring and exception routing.
07Gate officer workflow.
08Yard and terminal-system integration.
09Misread and retention cases.
10Guardrails and access controls.
11Movement-trail instrumentation.
12Deployment, documentation and Agent Care handover.
12 workstreams · 6 weeks · bar shows the weeks a workstream is active — several run in parallelFinal scope and sequence confirmed in discovery
Engagement tiers
What each tier includes
Rows are the capabilities named in each tier's scope. Higher tiers include everything below them.
Capability✓ in scope · — not at this tierPilotOne gate, one laneProductionProduction yard systemsAdvancedMultiple sites / gates
Introduced at Pilot
Reading to your gate rules✓✓✓
Gate officer approval✓✓✓
Read-accuracy baseline✓✓✓
Introduced at Production
Reporting by gate and lane—✓✓
Officer workflow in your systems—✓✓
Approved movement write-back—✓✓
Yard-system integration—✓✓
Introduced at Advanced
Multi-site retention and access rules——✓
Multi-stage gate approvals——✓
High gate volume——✓
Multi-site gate controls——✓
Build priceFrom $5,000From $8,000Custom quote
Final build priceConfirmed after discovery based on integrations, workflow complexity, transaction volume, approval controls and deployment requirements.
Separate from buildBuild pricing is separate from recurring Agent Care, which covers managed monitoring, evaluations, incidents and verified improvements after launch.
What we need from you
What you bring, and what we build with it
Each input maps to a piece of build scope and a week in the delivery timeline.
You bringWe build with it
01Your gate layout, lanes and camera positions→Camera, lane and read-condition mappingWeek 1
02Representative frames, including the bad ones→Read baseline, character extraction and check logicWeek 2
03Your retention schedule and who may view footage→Retention-rule mapping and automation-boundary definitionWeek 1
04Access to relevant APIs, feeds or exports→Camera, lane and terminal assessment, then integration setupWeek 2
05Reads you would not want acted on→Misread cases and failure-mode testingWeek 4
06What a read may never authorise on its own→Confidence scoring, exception routing, guardrails, retention and access controlsWeek 3
07Named gate officers to accept reads→Gate officer workflow, then pilot and production validationWeeks 5–6
Nothing else is requiredDeployment, documentation and Agent Care handover are ours.
Delivery timeline
Four phases across six weeks
The bands sit on the weeks the work occupies, which is why the fifth carries two kinds at once.
PhaseW1W2W3W4W5W6
DiscoveryW1
BuildW2 – W3
EvaluateW4 – W5
Pilot & LaunchW5 – W6
Week focusW1Gate and yard workflow discovery, lane rules and the automation boundaryW2Camera and terminal integration and the read baselineW3Read workflow, confidence logic and officer controlsW4Evaluation suite, misread cases and failure-mode testingW5Yard-system integration, pilot lanes and targeted correctionsW6One gate cycle run under the yard team, then Agent Care handover
Reading the bandEvery bar covers the weeks its own work runs and no others. The fifth week genuinely doubles up.
At the end of W6The cycle closes the validation and Agent Care takes over monitoring.
DurationSix-week plan shown · typical delivery 4–6 weeks depending on scope confirmed in discovery.
Next step · Transportation AI agent
Build a gate vision agent around who decides at the lane.
A wrong read releases the wrong box, and a missed defect writes a clean interchange receipt over real damage. Show us your gates and we'll name what stays with the officer.