Collect the standard fields for a port in or out, run the configured checks, and hold — a provisioning person decides anything that would delay the port, and the one-business-day clock keeps running.
Survivors are the cohort no aggregate counts: a line-separation request is confidential by law, so it never appears in a fraud or retention report. Nestack reports the desk-correction rate by slice, not only in total.
Slice performance — reported separately, not only in aggregateIllustrative example
Slice
Failure rate
Lift
Lift vs. threshold
Status
Line-separation requests
7.0%
3.4×
Review
Ports with a disputed balance
4.5%
2.2×
Review
Non-simple and multi-line ports
3.3%
1.6×
Watch
Standard simple ports
1.2%
0.6×
Normal
Bar: desk-correction-rate lift vs. the all-orders baseline · scale 0–4.0× · tick marks the 2.0× review threshold2 of 4 slices over threshold
Evidence-linked improvement
The cycle ends in a case, not a note
An apology does not close a cycle; a case the next release must pass does. That suite is what the next port through the desk is measured against.
Improvement cycle · five stagesSwitchback — the path turns at Improve and returns at Learn
01Detect
Desk-correction rate rises in an order slice.
02Diagnose
Within the same business day, the desk reads the orders behind the rise until the cause narrows to one.
03Improve
The correction is versioned, with the orders that motivated it attached.
04Verify
A failing case holds the release until it passes.
05Learn
The case is added permanently, and the port rules move with it.
Learn → DetectThe return edge. The next cycle is measured against a suite one case longer.
Typical build scope
Twelve workstreams across six weeks
The build scope read against the delivery timeline. Week structure follows the six-week plan — discovery, sources, order workflow, evaluation, integration, then production validation and handover.
WorkstreamWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6
01Porting workflow discovery and automation-boundary definition.
02Order and LSR source assessment.
03Standard field-set and interval-rule mapping for each market.
04Order ingestion and field normalisation.
05Validation logic and record binding.
06Confidence scoring and desk routing.
07Provisioning release workflow.
08Order-management and LSR integration.
09Port-interval and field cases.
10Guardrails and authorisation controls.
11Order-trail instrumentation.
12Deployment, documentation and Agent Care handover.
12 workstreams · 6 weeks · bar shows the weeks a workstream is active — several run in parallelFinal scope and sequence confirmed in discovery
Engagement tiers
What each tier includes
Rows are the capabilities named in each tier's scope. Higher tiers include everything below them.
Capability✓ in scope · — not at this tierPilotOne market, one order pathProductionProduction order systemsAdvancedMultiple markets / brands
Introduced at Pilot
Order preparation on your rules✓✓✓
Provisioning release✓✓✓
Port-completion baseline✓✓✓
Introduced at Production
Reporting by order type—✓✓
Desk workflow in your systems—✓✓
Approved write-back—✓✓
Order-management integration—✓✓
Introduced at Advanced
Multi-market interval rules——✓
Multi-stage provisioning approvals——✓
High port volume——✓
Multi-market porting controls——✓
Build priceFrom $5,000From $8,000Custom quote
Final build priceConfirmed after discovery based on integrations, workflow complexity, transaction volume, approval controls and deployment requirements.
Separate from buildBuild pricing is separate from recurring Agent Care, which covers managed monitoring, evaluations, incidents and verified improvements after launch.
What we need from you
What you bring, and what we build with it
Each input maps to a piece of build scope and a week in the delivery timeline.
You bringWe build with it
01Your order intake fields and account record structure→Order ingestion and field mappingWeek 1
02Representative completed port orders→Validation baseline, field-set extraction and record bindingWeek 2
03Your market rules and assigned-passcode policy→Field-set, interval and market-rule mappingWeek 1
04Access to relevant APIs, feeds or exports→Order and LSR assessment, then integration setupWeek 2
05Ports you would not want delayed→Interval cases and the evaluation suiteWeek 4
06What must reach a person before a port is held→Confidence scoring, desk routing, guardrails and release controlsWeek 3
07Named provisioning staff to release orders→Provisioning release workflow, then pilot and production validationWeeks 5–6
Nothing else is requiredDeployment, documentation and Agent Care handover are ours.
Delivery timeline
Four phases across six weeks
Each band covers the weeks the work really takes, so week 5 carries evaluation and launch together.
PhaseW1W2W3W4W5W6
DiscoveryW1
BuildW2 – W3
EvaluateW4 – W5
Pilot & LaunchW5 – W6
Week focusW1Porting workflow discovery, field mapping and the automation boundaryW2Order and LSR integration and the validation baselineW3Order workflow, confidence logic and release controlsW4Evaluation suite, interval checks and failure-mode testingW5Order-system integration, pilot ports and targeted correctionsW6One porting cycle run under the provisioning desk, then handover
Reading the bandEach band spans only the weeks its work is named in. The fifth week genuinely carries two kinds of work.
At the end of W6Validation finishes on live orders and Agent Care assumes monitoring.
DurationSix-week plan shown · typical delivery 4–6 weeks depending on scope confirmed in discovery.
Next step · Telecom AI agent
Build a porting agent around the interval you are already bound by.
Show us your order path, your field set and who releases a port. Get it wrong and the delay is itself the violation — so we map the boundary and name what stays with a person.