Answer account, service and billing questions from the records your carrier already holds, run the authentication challenge your policy configures, and hold anything chargeable — or any call detail — for a named adviser.
Overall answer quality can hide one contact reason
The slice a total buries here is call-detail and usage requests: few contacts, most of the corrections. Nestack reports the correction rate by contact reason, not only in total.
Slice performance — reported separately, not only in aggregateIllustrative example
Slice
Failure rate
Lift
Lift vs. threshold
Status
Call-detail and usage requests
4.9%
3.5×
Review
Billing disputes and credits
3.6%
2.6×
Review
Feature and add-on changes
2.5%
1.8×
Watch
Routine account questions
1.3%
0.9×
Normal
Bar: adviser-correction lift vs. the routine-account baseline · scale 0–4.0× · tick marks the 2.0× review threshold2 of 4 slices over threshold
Evidence-linked improvement
The loop ends in a regression case
A cycle closes when the failure is a regression case the next release has to pass. That suite is what the next contact into care is measured against.
Improvement cycle · five stagesSwitchback — the path turns at Improve and returns at Learn
01Detect
Adviser corrections rise in one contact reason.
02Diagnose
The case record is the unit of diagnosis — the question, the authentication run against it, the record answered from and who took it over.
03Improve
The change ships against a version, with the contacts that exposed it attached.
04Verify
Release is blocked until the affected regression cases pass again.
05Learn
The case joins the permanent suite and the care playbook.
Learn → DetectThe return edge. Detection starts again against a suite one case longer.
Typical build scope
Twelve workstreams across six weeks
The build scope read against the delivery timeline. Week structure follows the six-week plan — discovery, sources, contact workflow, evaluation, integration, then production validation and handover.
WorkstreamWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6
01Support workflow discovery and boundary definition.
02Care-platform and billing-data assessment.
03Authentication tiers, disclosure rules and hold points.
04Contact and account-record ingestion.
05Answering logic and record binding.
06Confidence scoring and hold routing.
07Adviser review workflow.
08Care-platform and billing integration.
09Authentication-path cases.
10Guardrails and disclosure controls.
11Contact-trail instrumentation.
12Deployment, documentation and Agent Care handover.
12 workstreams · 6 weeks · bar shows the weeks a workstream is active — several run in parallelFinal scope and sequence confirmed in discovery
Engagement tiers
What each tier includes
Rows are the capabilities named in each tier's scope. Higher tiers include everything below them.
Capability✓ in scope · — not at this tierPilotOne brand, one contact channelProductionProduction care platformAdvancedMultiple brands / markets
Introduced at Pilot
Answering from your records✓✓✓
Adviser review✓✓✓
Answer-quality baseline✓✓✓
Introduced at Production
Reporting by contact reason—✓✓
Review workflow in your systems—✓✓
Approved write-back—✓✓
Care-platform integration—✓✓
Introduced at Advanced
Multi-brand and multi-market rollout——✓
Multi-stage adviser approvals——✓
High contact volume——✓
Multi-market care controls——✓
Build priceFrom $5,000From $8,000Custom quote
Final build priceConfirmed after discovery based on integrations, workflow complexity, contact volume, escalation controls and deployment requirements.
Separate from buildBuild pricing is separate from recurring Agent Care, which covers managed monitoring, evaluations, incidents and verified improvements after launch.
What we need from you
What you bring, and what we build with it
Each input maps to a piece of build scope and a week in the delivery timeline.
You bringWe build with it
01Your authentication policy and its tiers→Contact and account-record ingestionWeek 1
02Representative contacts from a past quarter→Answering baseline, context gathering and record bindingWeek 2
03Your contact-preference and revocation rules→Disclosure-rule mapping and the automation boundaryWeek 1
04Access to relevant APIs, feeds or exports→Care-platform, billing and identity assessment, then integration setupWeek 2
05Answers you would not want repeated→Authentication cases and failure-mode testingWeek 4
06Where an answer must stop and wait for an adviser→Confidence scoring, hold routing, guardrails and disclosure controlsWeek 3
07Named advisers to release held contacts→Adviser review workflow, then pilot and production validationWeeks 5–6
Nothing else is requiredDeployment, documentation and Agent Care handover are ours.
Delivery timeline
Four phases across six weeks
Each phase sits on the weeks it actually occupies, and week 5 carries both evaluation and launch work.
PhaseW1W2W3W4W5W6
DiscoveryW1
BuildW2 – W3
EvaluateW4 – W5
Pilot & LaunchW5 – W6
Week focusW1Care workflow discovery, disclosure mapping and the automation boundaryW2Source integration and the answering baselineW3Answering workflow, confidence logic and adviser controlsW4Evaluation suite, authentication-path checks and failure-mode testingW5Platform integration, a pilot contact queue and targeted correctionsW6A live care queue answered under supervision, then Agent Care handover
Reading the bandEach bar covers only the weeks its work is named in. The fifth week doubles because the work overlaps.
At the end of W6Validation closes on live contacts, and Agent Care picks up monitoring.
DurationSix-week plan shown · typical delivery 4–6 weeks depending on scope confirmed in discovery.
Next step · Telecom AI agent
Build a customer-support agent around your authentication policy.
We'll map the contact path, set the automation boundary and name what the agent hands over. You bring your authentication policy, the billing and account systems behind it, and the advisers who take what it will not finish.