Automated Highlights & Content-Generation AI Agent
Detect the moments, cut them to the template configured for that competition, label what the model generated, and hold the queue for the named rights approver, who decides whether anything is published.
Break the edit rate down by competition and by content type before you read it — a few cohorts absorb most of the rework, and the total describes none of them. Nestack reports it by slice.
Slice performance — reported separately, not only in aggregateIllustrative example
Slice
Failure rate
Lift
Lift vs. threshold
Status
Archive and library footage
4.0%
3.2×
Review
Synthetic commentary cutdowns
3.0%
2.4×
Review
Multi-territory competitions
1.9%
1.5×
Watch
Standard league cutdowns
1.0%
0.8×
Normal
Bar: approver-edit-rate lift vs. standard-cutdown baseline · scale 0–4.0× · tick marks the 2.0× review threshold2 of 4 slices over threshold
Evidence-linked improvement
The loop ends in the regression suite
Nothing shuts because it was explained. It shuts when a case exists that the next release must pass, and that suite is what the next cut is measured against.
Improvement cycle · five stagesSwitchback — the path turns at Improve and returns at Learn
01Detect
Approver-edit rate rises in one competition.
02Diagnose
Pull the clip and the record it was cut under, and read both until one of them accounts for it.
03Improve
The change is versioned with the clips that forced it attached.
04Verify
Release stops until the affected cases pass again.
05Learn
The case stays in the suite, and the clearance rules are updated.
Learn → DetectThe return edge. The next detection runs against a suite one case longer.
Typical build scope
Twelve workstreams across six weeks
The build scope read against the delivery timeline. Week structure follows the six-week plan — discovery, sources, cutting workflow, evaluation, integration, then production validation and handover.
WorkstreamWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6
01Highlights workflow discovery and boundary definition.
02Feed and media-asset source review.
03Rights-record, territory and labelling-rule mapping.
04Feed ingestion and clip normalisation.
05Detection logic and rights-record binding.
06Confidence scoring and element routing.
07Rights approval workflow.
08Media-asset and publishing integration.
09Clearance regression cases.
10Guardrails and rights controls.
11Clip-trail instrumentation.
12Deployment, documentation and Agent Care handover.
12 workstreams · 6 weeks · bar shows the weeks a workstream is active — several run in parallelFinal scope and sequence confirmed in discovery
Engagement tiers
What each tier includes
Rows are the capabilities named in each tier's scope. Higher tiers include everything below them.
Capability✓ in scope · — not at this tierPilotOne competition, one feedProductionProduction publishing systemsAdvancedMultiple competitions / brands
Introduced at Pilot
Cutting to your templates and records✓✓✓
Rights approval✓✓✓
Clip-quality baseline✓✓✓
Introduced at Production
Reporting by competition—✓✓
Approval workflow in your systems—✓✓
Approved write-back—✓✓
Media-asset-system integration—✓✓
Introduced at Advanced
Multi-territory rights rules——✓
Multi-stage rights approvals——✓
High fixture volume——✓
Multi-competition rights controls——✓
Build priceFrom $5,000From $8,000Custom quote
Final build priceConfirmed after discovery based on integrations, workflow complexity, fixture volume, approval controls and deployment requirements.
Separate from buildBuild pricing is separate from recurring Agent Care, which covers managed monitoring, evaluations, incidents and verified improvements after launch.
What we need from you
What you bring, and what we build with it
Each input maps to a piece of build scope and a week in the delivery timeline.
You bringWe build with it
01Your competition list and rights records→Feed ingestion and rights-record mappingWeek 1
02Representative clips you already publish→Cutting baseline, template extraction and record bindingWeek 2
03Your labelling, territory and platform rules→Rights-record, territory and labelling-rule mappingWeek 1
04Access to relevant APIs, feeds or exports→Feed, media-asset and publishing assessment, then integration setupWeek 2
05Clips that should never have published→Clearance cases and failure-mode testingWeek 4
06What has to be cleared before a clip goes out→Confidence scoring, flag routing, guardrails and rights controlsWeek 3
07Named rights approvers to release clips→Rights approval workflow, then pilot and production validationWeeks 5–6
Nothing else is requiredDeployment, documentation and Agent Care handover are ours.
Delivery timeline
Four phases across six weeks
Phases sit on the weeks they truly occupy, so the fifth week carries evaluation and launch at once.
PhaseW1W2W3W4W5W6
DiscoveryW1
BuildW2 – W3
EvaluateW4 – W5
Pilot & LaunchW5 – W6
Week focusW1Highlights workflow discovery, rights mapping and the automation boundaryW2Feed integration and the cutting baselineW3Cutting workflow, confidence logic and rights controlsW4Evaluation suite, labelling checks and failure-mode testingW5Publishing integration, pilot fixtures and targeted correctionsW6One competition round cut under the media team, then Agent Care handover
Reading the bandA bar covers only the weeks its work is named in. The two bars in week 5 are real work running together.
At the end of W6The round closes the validation and Agent Care takes on monitoring.
DurationSix-week plan shown · typical delivery 4–6 weeks depending on scope confirmed in discovery.
Next step · Sports & Fitness AI agent
Build a highlights agent around the rights record it cuts against.
Show us your competitions, your rights records and who releases a clip. If you can name the record and the approver, we will map the workflow and set the boundary.