Nestack Agent Care
Industries / Insurance / FNOL agent

Insurance AI agent · FNOL

FNOL-Intake & Routing AI Agent

Take first notice of loss on any channel, match it to the policy in force at the date of loss, capture the facts and route it — and state no coverage position.

4–6 weeksTypical delivery
Your stackDeployment
Person onlyCoverage position
Agent CareAfter launch

What this agent does

Opens the claim, never the coverage

In
01

Take the notice as it arrives — phone, portal, app, broker or email — and keep the words the notifier used.

02

Find the policy and the period in force at the date of loss, endorsements, lapse and cancellation included.

Reason
03

Capture what happened, when and where, the property or vehicle involved, and everyone else who was there.

04

Ask about injuries, third parties, witnesses and emergency services, and record the answers as given.

05

Raise total-loss, catastrophe, liability and vulnerability indicators, and check for a claim already open.

Decide
06

Where the policy matches and no indicator fires, the claim opens and routes to the queue that owns it.

07

Injury, distress, a policy that will not match or any question about cover goes to a person at once.

Out
08

Open the claim, timestamp the notice, send the acknowledgement you approved, and request what is missing.

09

Retain the channel, the words used, the policy version read, the indicators raised and the queue it went to.

Product statement

The agent captures, checks the policy was in force and routes. It states no coverage position — not on the call, not in the portal, not in the acknowledgement — and anything that sounds like one belongs to a person.

Example workflow

One notice, end to end

AgentHuman
1Notice receivedA call, a portal or app submission, a broker notification or an email, with the channel and the time it arrived
2Policy matched at the date of lossCover, period, endorsements, lapse and cancellation as they stood, and whether more than one policy could respond
3Loss facts capturedWhat happened, when and where, the property or vehicle, third parties, injuries and emergency services attending
4Indicators checkedInjury, liability, total-loss, catastrophe, duplicate and vulnerability flags, and the documents still outstanding
No human action required

Stages 1 to 4 run without a person in the loop — the policy match, the loss facts and the indicator checks are finished before anything is opened. Nothing has been said about cover.

5DecisionSplits on whether the policy matched and no indicator needs a person
Policy matched, nothing flagged

Opens and routes to the owning queue.

Injury, distress or a coverage question

Goes to a person, on the spot.

Claims handler

Takes the notice while the notifier is still there where the channel allows, with the flags named and the policy as read. Anything about cover is theirs.

Open · Correct · Escalate
Handled — handed back
6Claim opened and routedTimestamped, acknowledged on your approved template, and sent to the queue that owns that claim type
7Outcome evaluatedPolicy-match accuracy, capture completeness, duplicates, escalation appropriateness and time to open, by channel and language
Handler changes

Every field a handler corrects after intake is counted, by channel.

What should not run autonomously

Human approval stays in control

Outside the boundary — human approval required8 items
Telling a claimant whether the loss is covered.
Denying, declining or closing a notified claim.
Advising on excess, limits or likely settlement.
Recording a reported loss as anything but a claim.
Automation boundaryAgent acts unaided
Match the policy and the period in force at the date of loss.
Capture the loss facts, parties and injuries as the notifier gives them.
Raise total-loss, catastrophe, duplicate and vulnerability indicators.
Open the claim, acknowledge on your template and route to the owning queue.
Write actions run only inside the approval boundaries agreed during implementation. Opening and routing a claim is one of them; saying anything about cover is not, on any tier.
Handling an injured, bereaved or distressed caller alone.
Taking a recorded statement about fault or liability.
Promising a repairer, hire car or benefit entitlement.
Changing routing rules, indicators or escalation triggers.

Example output

One notice of loss, annotated

Everything the agent records is attached to the channel and the policy version it came from.

FNOL output · single noticeIllustrative example
Channel
Policy at loss date
Reported
Routed to
Confidence
Coverage position
Out-of-hours call
In force, endorsed
Escape of water
Property — mitigation
93%
None — a handler's
As receivedThe notice as it was given, on the channel it arrived, with the time of receipt and the policy as it stood that day.
Checks cleared Policy in force at loss No open claim on file No injury reported
Why this queueFrom the peril, the indicators and your routing rules — not from any view about cover.
ActionOpenCorrectEscalate
What the score decidesWhether the capture may route unattended. It decides nothing about cover.

Value

Where AI adds value

The same four claims, placed at the point in the workflow where each one applies.

Where the value landsValue 01 – 04
Every notice of lossFrom phone, portal, app, broker and email
03Policy & period

Match the policy and period in force that day

Cover, period, endorsements, lapse and cancellation as they stood on the date of loss — read at intake and stamped with the version.

01Approved path

Capture it once, properly

The facts an adjuster will need are asked for while the notifier is still there, on every channel, so the file opens complete rather than half-built.

02Human review

Hand the hard notices over early

An injury, a death, a shaken caller or a policy that will not match reaches a person straight away — not after the claim has been opened against the wrong cover.

04Build an evidence trail

Retain the channel and the words used, the policy version read, the indicators raised, the acknowledgement sent and the queue it went to — on both paths.

Integrations

Typical integrations

Five system groups connect to the same agent. Which of them are in scope is decided in discovery.

Policy admin & claimsGuidewire · Duck Creek · Sapiens
Majesco · Policy and claim APIs
Voice & messagingTelephony and IVR · chat, SMS and WhatsApp
Transcription · call recording
Portal, app & brokerPolicyholder portal · mobile app
Broker and MGA feeds · web forms

Agent

FNOL intake & routing

Captures the notice
Matches the policy
Routes the claim

Evidence & assistancePhoto capture · document upload
Make-safe dispatch · CAT event feeds
Observability & evaluationOpenTelemetry · Langfuse
Supported monitoring/evaluation sources

Integration availability depends on the client's existing systems and API access.

Agent controls

Six layers between the model and the claim file

Each control wraps the one inside it. A notice clears every layer before a claim is opened, and a coverage position never clears them at all.

L6 · Outermost — last line of defenceInward → L1 · closest to the model
L6Rollback / safe modeReturn intake on a channel to staff if capture or routing degrades.Roll back
L5TraceabilityRecord the channel, the words used, the policy version and the route.Record
L4Escalation gateInjury, death, distress and vulnerability reach a person immediately.Escalate
L3No-coverage ruleNo coverage position, no excess figure, no view on who was at fault.Withhold
L2Capture completenessThe required fields for that claim type, or the notice does not route.Require
L1Policy match checkThe policy and period in force at the date of loss, or no match at all.Verify
Model coreCaptured notice — the policy matched at the date of loss, the loss facts, the indicators raised and confidence
L1 – L2Decide whether the notice may route
L3Keeps a coverage position out of the agent
L4Puts the hard notices in front of a person
L5 – L6Keep the trail and pull automation back

How Nestack evaluates it

Evaluate the capture — and what the adjuster had to chase.

Coverage runs the whole depth of the workflow, and every layer is cut by slice.

Surface — the acknowledgement the claimant receives
Depth of coverage ▼
E1Final-output evaluationWas the claim opened against the right policy and the right period?
E2Capture evaluationDid the file hold what the adjuster later had to go back and ask for?
E3Tool evaluationDid it read the right policy record and open one claim, not two?
E4Escalation evaluationDid injury, distress and vulnerability reach a person, and how quickly?
E5Slice evaluationHow does performance change across channels, languages and claim types?
E6Business outcomeTime to claim open, rework after first touch, and complaints about intake.
Floor — the claim file the adjuster inherits

Failure modes

Where each failure originates in the agent

Seven failure modes plotted against the five stages of the agent lifecycle.

Agent lifecycleDirection of processing →
01 · Intake2 modes
FN-01

Date of loss taken wrong

Recorded as the day reported, not the day of loss.

FN-02

Distress met with a script

A shaken or bereaved caller gets the routine path.

Stage capturesThe notice as given, on the channel it arrived
02 · Policy match1 mode
FN-03

Wrong policy or period matched

Cover read as it stands now, not at the loss.

Stage matchesThe policy and period in force at the date of loss
03 · Triage2 modes
FN-04

Injury or third party missed

A liability exposure opens as a property claim.

FN-05

Total loss or CAT not flagged

The claim misses the surge path and the event code.

Stage flagsInjury, severity, catastrophe and vulnerability
04 · Open & route1 mode
FN-06

Duplicate opened on one loss

The same loss notified again on another channel.

Stage routesThe claim record, the acknowledgement, the queue
05 · Drift / Version1 mode
FN-07

One channel quietly degrades

Capture slips on one channel, and in one language.

Stage tracksRules, channels and how capture holds up
Sev-1 · wrong at first contact, and it sticks Sev-2 · the file is thin or wrongly queued Sev-3 · found later, at the claimant's cost

Affected slices

The worst capture draws the fewest complaints

A few channel and language cohorts carry most of the missing fields, and they are the cohorts least likely to complain about it. Routing built from channel, postcode or claim history stands in for who the claimant is. Nestack reports performance by slice, not only in total.

Slice performance — reported separately, not only in aggregateIllustrative example
SliceFailure rateLift Lift vs. thresholdStatus
Non-native-speaker callers6.6%3.8× Review
Out-of-hours phone notices5.1%2.9× Review
Broker-notified losses3.3%1.9× Watch
Repeat routine motor claims1.2%0.7× Normal
Bar: missed-capture lift vs. routine motor-claim baseline · scale 0–4.0× · tick marks the 2.0× review threshold 2 of 4 slices over threshold

Evidence-linked improvement

Every field the adjuster chased is a capture defect

The first thing an adjuster does with a thin file is telephone the claimant again. That second call is the measurement, and it belongs to the intake that caused it.

Improvement cycle · five stagesSwitchback — the path turns at Improve and returns at Learn
01Detect

A slice starts losing fields, duplicating notices or missing escalations.

02Diagnose

The question set, the policy match, the indicators or the channel — one of them.

03Improve

A question, a match rule or a routing rule changes — signed by the claims officer, dated and versioned.

04Verify

Replayed over held-back notices, and over every file an adjuster had to reopen.

05Learn

The chased field becomes a required capture, and a case the next release must pass.

Learn → DetectThe return edge. Every cycle also re-reads the escalation triggers — a distressed caller the agent kept to itself means the trigger was wrong, not the caller.

Typical build scope

Twelve workstreams across six weeks

The build scope read against the delivery timeline. Week structure follows the six-week plan — discovery, channels and policy matching, capture and escalation rules, evaluation, routing and live intake, then production validation and handover.

Workstream Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6
01Workflow discovery and automation-boundary definition.
02Channel inventory and intake-path mapping.
03Policy admin and claims API assessment.
04Policy-at-loss-date and in-force checks.
05Question sets and capture rules by claim type.
06Injury, third-party and liability capture.
07Total-loss, catastrophe and duplicate flags.
08Distress and vulnerability escalation triggers.
09Acknowledgement wording and notice sign-off.
10Capture and escalation evaluation.
11Routing rules, queue ownership and claim opening.
12Deployment, documentation and Agent Care handover.
12 workstreams · 6 weeks · bar shows the weeks a workstream is active — several run in parallel Final scope and sequence confirmed in discovery

Engagement tiers

What each tier includes

Rows are the capabilities named in each tier's scope. Higher tiers include everything below them.

Capability✓ in scope · — not at this tier PilotOne channel, one claim type ProductionLive intake on one line AdvancedAll channels / multi-line
Introduced at Pilot
Policy-at-loss-date matching
Structured loss capture
Escalation to a person
Shadow mode — captures, opens nothing
Baseline evaluation
Introduced at Production
Claim opening and acknowledgement
Injury and third-party capture
Duplicate and prior-claim checks
Routing rules and queue ownership
Introduced at Advanced
Catastrophe surge handling
Multi-channel and enterprise controls
Build price From $5,000 From $8,000 Custom quote
Final build priceConfirmed after discovery based on the channels and lines in scope, the policy and claims systems involved, telephony and messaging integrations, notice volume, escalation and routing controls, and deployment requirements.
Separate from buildBuild pricing is separate from recurring Agent Care, which covers managed monitoring, evaluations, incidents and verified improvements after launch.

What we need from you

What you bring, and what we build with it

Each input maps to a piece of build scope and a week in the delivery timeline.

You bringWe build with it
01Every channel a loss can arrive on today Workflow discovery, channel inventory and the automation boundaryWeek 1
02Access to policy admin and claims, endorsements included Policy-at-loss-date matching and in-force checksWeek 2
03The fields your adjusters actually need, by claim type Question sets, capture rules and the indicators that fireWeek 3
04Your policy on injury, distress and vulnerable customers Escalation triggers and the route to a personWeek 3
05Your acknowledgement wording, and what may never be said Notice templates and the no-coverage ruleWeek 4
06Recent notices, including the reopened and the duplicated Evaluation suite, regression cases and failure-mode testingWeek 4
07Named handlers and the queue that owns each claim type Routing rules, queue ownership and live intakeWeeks 5–6
Nothing else is required Deployment, documentation and Agent Care handover are ours.

Delivery timeline

Four phases across six weeks

Phases are drawn over the weeks they actually occupy. Nothing is opened in your claims system before week 6 — intake runs alongside your handlers until then.

Phase W1W2W3W4W5W6
Discovery W1
Build W2 – W3
Evaluate W4 – W5
Pilot & Launch W5 – W6
Week focus W1Channels in scope, escalation policy and who owns each queue W2Policy-at-loss-date matching and in-force checks W3Capture rules, injury questions and escalation triggers W4Acknowledgement wording, evaluation suite and failure-mode testing W5Live notices captured alongside handlers, and compared field by field W6Claims opened and routed from the agent's capture, then handover
Reading the bandBars span only the weeks their work is named in. Week 5 is shadow running — the same notice is captured twice and the two files are compared.
At the end of W6Claims are opened and routed from the agent's capture, and every question about cover in that period went to a person.
DurationSix-week plan shown · typical delivery 4–6 weeks depending on scope confirmed in discovery.

Next step · Insurance AI agent

Fix the first five minutes of the claim.

Show us how a loss reaches you on each channel, what your adjusters have to chase afterwards, and your policy on injury and distress. We'll capture one notice end to end, agree the wording that may never appear in an acknowledgement, and mark every point where a person has to take the call.

Nestack Agents · FNOL intake & routingAGT-INS-07 · Agent Care available after launch