Send routine school messages to the contacts a rights check has cleared, hold anything legally operative for a person, and treat a custody or safety restriction as a limit the agent cannot cross.
The baseline is the error rate across every message the district sends, and it is low. Three cohorts sit several times above it Nestack reports it by slice rather than in aggregate..
Slice performance — reported separately, not only in aggregateIllustrative example
Slice
Failure rate
Lift
Lift vs. threshold
Status
Households with a restriction on file
7.0%
3.9×
Review
Notices to families with a language need
6.1%
3.4×
Review
Students whose rights have transferred
2.7%
1.5×
Watch
Routine notices to cleared contacts
0.9%
0.5×
Normal
Bar: error-rate lift vs. the all-message baseline · scale 0–4.0× · tick marks the 2.0× review threshold2 of 4 slices over threshold
Evidence-linked improvement
A coordinator cannot close a cycle
A cycle is finished when the failure sits in the suite as a case the next release must pass.
Improvement cycle · five stagesSwitchback — the path turns at Improve and returns at Learn
01Detect
Error rate rises in one household cohort.
02Diagnose
The sends, the contact history and the flag version are read together until one of them explains it.
03Improve
The correction carries its version and the messages behind it.
04Verify
The affected cases are re-run before anything ships.
05Learn
It lands in the permanent suite and in the contact rules.
Learn → DetectThe return edge. Every later detection runs against the longer suite.
Typical build scope
Twelve workstreams across six weeks
The build scope read against the delivery timeline. Week structure follows the six-week plan — discovery, contacts, message workflow, evaluation, integration, then production validation and handover.
WorkstreamWeek 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6
01Communication workflow discovery and scope.
02SIS and notification-platform assessment.
03Entitlement, restriction and message-category mapping.
04Contact ingestion and household resolution.
05Message assembly and rights-check.
06Confidence scoring and release routing.
07Staff release workflow.
08Notification- and SIS-platform integration.
09Delivery regression cases.
10Guardrails and rights controls.
11Delivery-trail instrumentation.
12Deployment, documentation and Agent Care handover.
12 workstreams · 6 weeks · bar shows the weeks a workstream is active — several run in parallelFinal scope and sequence confirmed in discovery
Engagement tiers
What each tier includes
Rows are the capabilities named in each tier's scope. Higher tiers include everything below them.
Capability✓ in scope · — not at this tierPilotOne school, one message setProductionProduction notification systemsAdvancedMultiple schools / districts
Introduced at Pilot
Messages to your contact rules✓✓✓
Staff release✓✓✓
Delivery baseline✓✓✓
Introduced at Production
Reporting by household—✓✓
Release workflow in your systems—✓✓
Approved write-back—✓✓
Notification-platform integration—✓✓
Introduced at Advanced
Multi-district and multi-state rules——✓
Multi-stage release approvals——✓
High message volume——✓
Enterprise contact controls——✓
Build priceFrom $5,000From $8,000Custom quote
Final build priceConfirmed after discovery based on integrations, workflow complexity, message volume, release controls and deployment requirements.
Separate from buildBuild pricing is separate from recurring Agent Care, which covers managed monitoring, evaluations, incidents and verified improvements after launch.
What we need from you
What you bring, and what we build with it
Each input maps to a piece of build scope and a week in the delivery timeline.
You bringWe build with it
01Your contact records and where restrictions live→Entitlement and restriction mappingWeek 1
02Representative sends from a past term→Delivery baseline, household normalisation and rights-check bindingWeek 2
03Your message categories and consent records→Entitlement, restriction and message-category mappingWeek 1
04Access to relevant APIs, feeds or exports→SIS, notification and special-education assessment, then integration setupWeek 2
05Messages that reached the wrong adult→Delivery cases and failure-mode testingWeek 4
06Which messages may never send without a rights check→Confidence scoring, release routing, guardrails and rights controlsWeek 3
07Named staff to release held messages→Staff release workflow, then pilot and production validationWeeks 5–6
Nothing else is requiredDeployment, documentation and Agent Care handover are ours.
Delivery timeline
Four phases across six weeks
Phases sit where the work is, which is why week 5 holds evaluation and pilot at the same time.
PhaseW1W2W3W4W5W6
DiscoveryW1
BuildW2 – W3
EvaluateW4 – W5
Pilot & LaunchW5 – W6
Week focusW1Communication workflow discovery, contact mapping and the automation boundaryW2Contact integration and the delivery baselineW3Message workflow, confidence logic and rights controlsW4Evaluation suite, restriction checks and failure-mode testingW5Platform integration, a pilot term and targeted correctionsW6A term of family communication under the school, then handover
Reading the bandBands cover the weeks their work is named in and no more. The doubled fifth week is real, not padding.
At the end of W6Everything verified on live sends, with Agent Care carrying it forward.
DurationSix-week plan shown · typical delivery 4–6 weeks depending on scope confirmed in discovery.
Next step · Education AI agent
Build a communication agent around your district's contact rules.
Show us your notification platform, your contact records and where custody restrictions are held. If your protective-order flags sit somewhere the messaging platform never reads, that is the first thing to fix; then we map the routing, set the automation boundary and name what stays with a person.