Nestack Agent Care
Industries / Construction / Workforce currency agent

Construction AI agent · Workforce currency

Workforce Licensing & Currency AI Agent

Licences, tickets and inductions expire on their own dates, not on yours. The agent tracks absence, currency and the clock, and never examines a document — the named employer representative does that, and attests.

4–6 weeksTypical delivery
Your stackDeployment
Per engagementOfficer attests
Agent CareAfter launch

What this agent does

Tracks the currency of people, not the standing of firms

In
01

A worker mobilises, and the agent opens a file against the role, the site and the jurisdiction over it.

02

A role is scoped, and the agent separates what statute requires of it from what the client requires by contract.

Reason
03

A US hire starts, and the agent runs the three-business-day Section 2 clock and reports the fields left blank.

04

A UK engagement starts on or after 1 October 2026, and the agent tests whether a check exists before day one.

05

A ticket falls due, and the agent counts the renewal window down against the work already rostered for that person.

Decide
06

An Australian high risk task is rostered, and the agent checks the licence class held against the class it needs.

07

A file is called for, and the agent produces what is held and names what is not, with where each item came from.

Out
08

An engagement ends, and the retention clock runs on its own arithmetic in each jurisdiction, per person.

09

Execute write actions only inside the approval boundaries agreed during implementation.

Product statement

The agent reports absence, currency and dates — never a view on a document, and never a list of people by nationality, visa type or country of issue, whoever is asking and whatever the reason given.

Example workflow

One worker, mobilisation to file

AgentHuman
1Worker nominatedDirect labour, labour hire, or a subcontractor at any tier
2Requirements assembledThe role, the site, the jurisdiction and what each of them requires of this person
3File comparedWhat is held, what is absent, what expires and confidence
4Controls appliedAbsence checks, expiry-window checks, identity-match checks and confidence threshold
No human action required

Stages 1 to 4 run unaided, and nothing is examined, judged or attested at any of them — the agent compares records, and the representative's lane opens at the confidence gate.

5DecisionBranches at the confidence threshold
High confidence

Goes to the employer representative.

Low confidence

Adds a site manager read first.

Representative review

The file is held with what is absent, what expires and the confidence.

Clear · Hold · Send to site manager
Cleared — released to work
6Register and site access updatedOnly where write access and approval policy allow it
7Outcome evaluatedAbsences found late, expiries missed, holds overturned and files produced complete
Holds lifted

Every hold lifted in review is counted in the evaluation.

What should not run autonomously

Human approval stays in control

Outside the boundary — human approval required8 items
Judging whether a document is genuine or belongs to the worker.
Signing or completing the attestation on the form.
Inferring, scoring or predicting immigration or citizenship status.
Listing workers by nationality, visa type or country of issue.
Automation boundaryAgent acts unaided
Map what the role, the site and the jurisdiction.
Compare that against what the file already holds, item by item.
Count down expiry, renewal and re-verification dates from the record.
Report what is absent, and hold the file open.
Any write happens inside the boundaries agreed at implementation, never ahead of an attestation.
Refusing or granting a worker entry to the site.
Certifying payroll or any statement about what was paid.
Granting, renewing or endorsing a licence, card or ticket.
Changes to currency rules or approval thresholds.

Example output

One worker, annotated

Subcontractor management checks the firm you engaged; this checks the person it sent.

Currency record · single workerIllustrative example
Role
Requirement
On file
Currency
Confidence
Consequence
Mobile crane operator
High risk work licence of the class the rostered lift actually needs
Expired, in window
Renewable — retraining after
91%
The PCBU must see written evidence
As receivedTaken from the register and the licence records as they stand — nothing on this side is written by the agent.
What was read Employer licence register Site induction record High risk task roster
Why this reads amberIt lapsed inside the twelve-month renewal window, so it is renewable rather than gone.
ActionClearHoldSend to site manager
What the score decidesBelow the configured threshold the file picks up a site manager read before.

Value

Where AI adds value

The same four claims, placed at the point in the workflow where each one applies.

Where the value landsValue 01 – 04
Every worker on fileFrom the register
03Currency

Check the person, not the firm

Read each requirement against the jurisdiction and the role on this site, and where the guidance is still draft, report it as draft.

01Approved path

It never reads a document

Routine renewals arrive already counted down against the work ahead.

02Human review

Send review to the ones that stop work

Absences and near expiries are marked, so the representative starts where the work is about to be blocked.

04Build an evidence trail

The worker, the requirement it maps to and the officer who attested stay on the file.

Integrations

Typical integrations

Five system groups connect to the same agent. Which of them are in scope is decided in discovery.

Workforce and HR recordsWorkday · SuccessFactors
Employment Hero · BambooHR
Site access and inductionDamstra · Rapid Global
Biosite · SALTO site access
Licence and card registersCSCS Smart Check · CITB
State WHS licence registers

Agent

Workforce licensing and currency

Reads the register
Assembles the file
Holds for the officer

Verification and inspectionE-Verify · Home Office check
Notice of Inspection pack
Observability & evaluationOpenTelemetry · Langfuse
Supported monitoring/evaluation sources

Integration availability depends on the client's existing systems and API access.

Agent controls

Six layers between the model and the attestation

The six narrow as they run. What none of them stops appears in the map beneath it.

L6 · Outermost — last line of defenceInward → L1 · closest to the model
L6Rollback / safe modePull the agent back to reporting only when evaluation or production signals degrade.Roll back
L5Version monitoringTrack model, prompt, currency-rule and jurisdiction configuration changes.Track
L4TraceabilityRecord what was read, what was reported absent, and who attested when.Record
L3Representative gateHold each file for the named representative; it gates release, not whether the record is complete.Gate
L2Policy guardrailsTest each output against the rules barring status inference and document judgement; a failure returns it.Restrict
L1Confidence thresholdsRoute low-confidence files to a site manager read first.Require review
Model coreFile assembled — requirements, absences, expiry dates and confidence
L1 – L2Test whether a file may stand
L3Puts the release in a representative's hands
L4 – L5Keep the worker and the requirement behind it
L6Holds the file at incomplete when signals degrade

How Nestack evaluates it

Evaluate the currency workflow — not only the finished file.

Coverage runs the whole depth of the workflow, and every layer is cut by slice.

Surface — the file an inspector pulls
Depth of coverage ▼
E1Final-output evaluationDid the file name every requirement that role and site carry?
E2Step-level evaluationDid the agent read the jurisdiction and the site rules in force?
E3Tool evaluationDid it read and write the correct person and the correct register?
E4Confidence calibrationDo low-confidence files actually attract more holds?
E5Slice evaluationHow does performance change across specific engagement types?
E6Business outcomeHow many absences surfaced only after the person was already working?
Floor — the record the representative attests

Failure modes

Where each failure originates in the agent

Seven failure modes, each set at the stage where it first appears.

Agent lifecycleDirection of processing →
01 · Retrieval1 mode
GI-01

Register misses the chain

Labour hire and lower tiers are not in the payroll source.

Stage gathersRegisters, licence records, inductions and rosters
02 · Reasoning2 modes
GI-02

Licence class not tested

A licence exists and is current, and is the wrong class.

GI-03

Renewal window read as gone

An expired licence still inside its window reads as lost.

Stage proposesRequirements, absences, dates and confidence
03 · Tool / write2 modes
GI-04

Two workers, one name

Credentials attach to the wrong person of that name.

GI-05

Clock never started

The hire date is right and the three-day clock is not run.

Stage writesOnly where write access and approval policy allow it
04 · Output1 mode
GI-06

Completeness read as fine

Form fields are full and the audit trail was never checked.

Stage returnsThe file the representative attests and an auditor pulls
05 · Change / Version1 mode
GI-07

Start date inherited

A new engagement carries the old date past 1 October.

Stage tracksModel, prompt, currency rules and site config
Sev-1 · the agent performs a held act Sev-2 · an absence reaches the roster Sev-3 · a register degrades, file to review

Affected slices

A clean site figure can rest on one trade

A site-level file-completeness figure can read well while a few trades and engagement types carry the missing items. No regulator publishes a construction breakout, so Nestack reports yours by slice.

Slice performance — reported separately, not only in aggregateIllustrative example
SliceFailure rateLift Lift vs. thresholdStatus
Third-tier subcontract9.1%3.7× Review
Labour hire and agency6.9%2.8× Review
High risk licensed trades4.0%1.6× Watch
Direct labour, one site1.9%0.8× Normal
Bar: missing-item-rate lift vs. a direct-labour baseline · scale 0–4.0× · tick marks the 2.0× review threshold 2 of 4 slices over threshold

Evidence-linked improvement

Every cycle leaves one more test behind

A cycle closes when the lapsed ticket is a regression case. That suite is what the next start worked is measured against.

Improvement cycle · five stagesSwitchback — the path turns at Improve and returns at Learn
01Detect

Missing-item rate rises in one trade.

02Diagnose

The ticket that expired between induction and the lift it was needed for is traced back to one step.

03Improve

The fix carries a number, and the sites that forced it travel with it.

04Verify

Nothing goes out until every touched worker case has passed again.

05Learn

It is kept permanently, and the currency rules are amended alongside it.

Learn → DetectThe return edge. The next detection runs against a suite one case longer.

Typical build scope

Twelve workstreams across six weeks

The build scope read against the delivery timeline. Week structure follows the six-week plan — discovery, sources, currency workflow, evaluation, integration, then production validation and handover.

Workstream Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6
01Workforce currency discovery and boundary definition.
02Register and HR source assessment.
03Jurisdiction, role and site requirement mapping.
04Person register ingestion and matching.
05Requirement comparison and absence logic.
06Confidence scoring and file routing.
07Employer representative review workflow.
08Register and site-access integration.
09Absence and expiry cases.
10Guardrails and attestation controls.
11Worker-trail instrumentation.
12Deployment, documentation and Agent Care handover.
12 workstreams · 6 weeks · bar shows the weeks a workstream is active — several run in parallel Final scope and sequence confirmed in discovery

Engagement tiers

What each tier includes

Rows are the capabilities named in each tier's scope. Higher tiers include everything below them.

Capability✓ in scope · — not at this tier PilotOne site, one trade ProductionProduction register systems AdvancedMultiple sites / jurisdictions
Introduced at Pilot
Currency checks to your rules
Representative review gate
File-completeness baseline
Introduced at Production
Reporting by trade
Review workflow in your systems
Approved write-back
Site-access integration
Introduced at Advanced
Multi-jurisdiction rule sets
Multi-stage site approvals
High headcount
Multi-site currency controls
Build price From $5,000 From $8,000 Custom quote
Final build priceConfirmed after discovery based on integrations, workflow complexity, workforce size, approval controls and deployment requirements.
Separate from buildBuild pricing is separate from recurring Agent Care, which covers managed monitoring, evaluations, incidents and verified improvements after launch.

What we need from you

What you bring, and what we build with it

Each input maps to a piece of build scope and a week in the delivery timeline.

You bringWe build with it
01Your worker register and engagement types Person-level register ingestion and matchingWeek 1
02Representative roles and the sites they cover Requirement mapping and the absence-detection baselineWeek 2
03Your jurisdiction, role and site requirement rules Requirement-rule mapping and automation-boundary definitionWeek 1
04Access to relevant APIs, feeds or exports Register, HR and site-access assessment, then integration setupWeek 2
05Files you would not want inspected Expiry cases and the evaluation suiteWeek 4
06What no attestation may borrow Confidence scoring, file routing, guardrails and approval controlsWeek 3
07Named employer representatives to review files Representative review workflow, then pilot and production validationWeeks 5–6
Nothing else is required Deployment, documentation and Agent Care handover are ours.

Delivery timeline

Four phases across six weeks

These widths track the weeks the work genuinely fills, so the fifth band is doubled on purpose.

Phase W1W2W3W4W5W6
Discovery W1
Build W2 – W3
Evaluate W4 – W5
Pilot & Launch W5 – W6
Week focus W1Workforce currency discovery, rule mapping and the automation boundary W2Register integration and the absence-detection baseline W3Requirement comparison, confidence logic and review controls W4Evaluation suite, guardrails and failure-mode testing W5Site-access integration, pilot crews and targeted corrections W6One mobilisation run under the employer representative, then Agent Care handover
Reading the bandA bar spans only the weeks its own work is named in. The week 5 overlap is worked time, not padding.
At the end of W6The final checks clear on live crews and monitoring moves to Agent Care.
DurationSix-week plan shown · typical delivery 4–6 weeks depending on scope confirmed in discovery.

Next step · Construction AI agent

Build a workforce currency agent around the attestation you already carry.

Three jurisdictions, three accountable acts: a perjury signature in the United States, no signature at all in the United Kingdom where the absent check is the liability, and an Australian duty to see the evidence first. Never a view on anybody status — acting on such a flag is itself the offence.

Nestack Agents · Workforce licensing and currencyAGT-CN-12 · Agent Care available after launch