Nestack Agent Care
Industries / Advertising & Marketing / Supply-path agent

Advertising AI agent · Supply-path & curation

Supply-Path Optimisation & Curation AI Agent

Map every path a bid can take to one impression, price the fees on each hop, and model what consolidating costs in reach, not just fees — the programmatic lead approves every change.

4–6 weeksTypical delivery
Your stackDeployment
Pre-cutoverBuyer approval
Agent CareAfter launch

What this agent does

Maps the paths, not the decision to cut one

In
01

A bid's path is pulled from the DSP log, every SSP report and each declared hop between them.

02

The schain object is read alongside it, as the payment path it shows and nothing more.

Reason
03

A curated deal is checked against its own terms and the curator's tie to each SSP inside it.

04

Every fee the path discloses is attributed to its hop; what isn't visible is marked, not estimated.

05

A proposed path change is modelled for the fee it moves and, separately, the reach it would cost.

Decide
06

A curator that is also the SSP running the auction is named, never modelled away.

07

Every proposed path change is routed to the named programmatic lead, never applied alone.

Out
08

The paths compared, the fees found and the buyer's decision are retained against the deal.

09

Execute write actions only inside the approval boundaries agreed during implementation.

Product statement

The agent maps paths and prices what it can see; the programmatic lead decides what changes, and the agent never cuts a path or renegotiates a fee itself.

Example workflow

One path change, signal to approval

AgentHuman
1Signal receivedPath-performance report, a curator renewal, a consolidation request or a new deal ID
2Evidence assembledDSP logs, SSP reports, curator terms and schain data, each with its source
3Change draftedPath map, fee attribution, reach estimate and confidence
4Controls appliedFee-visibility checks, curator-conflict checks, reach modelling and confidence threshold
No human action required

Stages 1 to 4 run unaided, and no path changes at any of them — the agent models, and the buyer's lane opens at the confidence gate.

5DecisionBranches at the confidence threshold
High confidence

Goes to the programmatic lead to approve.

Low confidence

Adds a second desk review first.

Buyer approval

The change is held with its evidence, its reach estimate and the confidence.

Approve · Edit · Escalate
Approved — cut over live
6DSP and SSP settings updatedOnly where write access and approval policy allow it
7Outcome evaluatedFee accuracy, reach delta, curator performance and post-cutover corrections
Edits

Every buyer edit is counted in the evaluation.

What should not run autonomously

Human approval stays in control

Outside the boundary — human approval required8 items
Cutting a supply path or ending a curator relationship.
Changing a bid floor, deal ID or SSP fee arrangement.
Deciding a curator's fee is undisclosed or improper.
Negotiating terms with an SSP, exchange or curator.
Automation boundaryAgent acts unaided
Map every declared path a bid can take to one impression.
Attribute each visible fee to the hop it was charged on.
Model the reach a proposed path cut would cost, not only the fee.
Flag a curator's tie to the SSP it curates, and hold the change for the buyer.
Any write happens inside the boundaries agreed at implementation, never ahead of approval.
Asserting a partner took an undisclosed margin.
Presenting a modelled fee saving as money recovered.
Adding a new SSP or curator to the buy.
Changes to fee-visibility rules, reach models or approval thresholds.

Example output

One path map, annotated

Everything the agent models is attached to the deal it was drawn from.

Supply-path output · single dealIllustrative example
Deal
Finding
Fee status
Evidence source
Confidence
Attribution
Curated video deal
Curator fee bundled into the deal's CPM, not itemised on the terms
Fee not itemised
This week's DSP log
81%
Programmatic-lead name on file
As receivedTaken from this week's DSP log and the curator's published deal terms — nothing on this side is written by the agent.
Paths checked DSP delivery log Curator deal terms SSP fee disclosure
Why it's flaggedThe CPM matches the insertion order, but the curator's own terms don't break out its fee.
ActionApproveEditEscalate
What the score decidesBelow the configured threshold the flag picks up a second desk review before it reaches.

Value

Where AI adds value

The same four claims, placed at the point in the workflow where each one applies.

Where the value landsValue 01 – 04
Every pathFrom the DSP and SSP feeds
03Mapping

Map every bid's path

Trace each hop a bid can take against the DSP log, the SSP report and the curator's terms.

01Approved path

A modelled saving is not a saving

Curated does not mean clean: the industry's own benchmark data still finds made-for-advertising inventory inside curated PMPs — smaller than the open exchange's rate, never zero.

02Human review

Send review to the costly paths

Undisclosed fees, conflicted curators and reach-losing cuts are marked, so the buyer's read starts where risk concentrates.

04Build an evidence trail

The path, the fees read against it and the buyer who cut it stay on the deal.

Integrations

Typical integrations

Five system groups connect to the same agent. Which of them are in scope is decided in discovery.

DSP & biddingThe Trade Desk · DV360
Amazon DSP · Yahoo DSP
SSPs & exchangesMagnite · PubMatic · Index
OpenX · Xandr · Equativ
Curation platformsScope3 · Audigent
Illuma · Sincera

Agent

Supply-path optimisation & curation

Maps the path
Prices the hop
Holds for the buyer

Verification & measurementDoubleVerify · IAS
MOAT · Human
Observability & evaluationOpenTelemetry · Langfuse
Supported monitoring/evaluation sources

Integration availability depends on the client's existing systems and API access.

Agent controls

Six layers between the model and the path

The layers sit inside one another. What none of them catches is listed in the map below.

L6 · Outermost — last line of defenceInward → L1 · closest to the model
L6Rollback / safe modeNarrow back to path reporting when evaluation or production signals degrade.Roll back
L5Version monitoringTrack model, prompt, fee-model and curator-terms changes.Track
L4TraceabilityRecord the paths compared, the fees found, the reach estimate and the buyer's decision.Record
L3Buyer approvalHold the change for the named buyer; it governs cutover, not whether the model is right.Gate
L2Policy guardrailsTest every change against configured fee-visibility and curator-conflict rules; a failure returns it.Restrict
L1Confidence thresholdsRoute low-confidence path changes to a second desk review.Require review
Model coreChange proposed — path map, fee attribution, reach estimate and confidence
L1 – L2Test whether a change may stand
L3Puts the cutover in the buyer's hands
L4 – L5Keep the path and the fees behind it
L6Narrows to path reporting when signals degrade

How Nestack evaluates it

Evaluate the path-mapping workflow — not only the final number.

Coverage runs the whole depth of the workflow, and every layer is cut by slice.

Surface — the path the buyer sees
Depth of coverage ▼
E1Final-output evaluationDid the attributed fee match a disclosed line at that hop?
E2Step-level evaluationDid the agent use the current DSP log, SSP report and curator terms?
E3Tool evaluationDid it read the correct deal ID and the correct SSP account?
E4Confidence calibrationDo low-confidence path changes actually attract more buyer escalations?
E5Slice evaluationHow does fee visibility change across specific supply types?
E6Business outcomeHow many proposed changes needed a buyer correction after cutover?
Floor — the outcome the buyer answers for

Failure modes

Where each failure originates in the agent

Seven failure modes, placed at the stage each one originates.

Agent lifecycleDirection of processing →
01 · Retrieval1 mode
SO-03

Stale path snapshot

The DSP log or SSP report read is a cached copy, not this hour's data.

Stage gathersDSP logs, SSP reports, curator terms and schain data
02 · Reasoning2 modes
SO-04

Blended MFA average cited

A network PMP average is reported as this deal's own MFA rate.

SO-06

Schain read as full custody

Payment-flow data is treated as proof of the full technical path.

Stage proposesPath map, fee attribution, reach and confidence
03 · Tool / write2 modes
SO-02

Uniform log-level assumed

Fee attribution assumes equal log-level detail from every SSP.

SO-05

Saving reported as realised

A modelled fee reduction is shown as money already recovered.

Stage writesOnly where write access and approval policy allow it
04 · Output1 mode
SO-01

Reach impact omitted

A proposed path cut reaches the buyer with no measured reach estimate attached.

Stage returnsThe path change the buyer approves
05 · Change / Version1 mode
SO-07

Silent fee-model drift

A model or terms update widens what the agent will treat as a disclosed fee.

Stage tracksModel, fee model, curator terms and schain version
Sev-1 · path cut outside the boundary Sev-2 · a wrong fee reaches the buyer Sev-3 · log degrades, change routes to review

Affected slices

Aggregate savings can hide one lost path

A blended fee number can look efficient while a handful of paths carry most of the rework. Nestack reports the path-rework rate by hop, not only in total Nestack reports it by slice rather than in aggregate..

Slice performance — reported separately, not only in aggregateIllustrative example
SliceFailure rateLift Lift vs. thresholdStatus
Impressions reachable on one path only7.7%4.0× Review
Curated deals built by a third party5.3%2.8× Review
Long-tail and open-exchange supply3.6%1.9× Watch
Direct SSP paths to major publishers1.9%0.7× Normal
Bar: path-rework rate lift vs. the direct-SSP baseline · scale 0–4.0× · tick marks the 2.0× review threshold 2 of 4 slices over threshold

Evidence-linked improvement

The loop closes on a path, not a projection

A cycle is done when the lost reach has become a case the next release must pass. That suite is what the next path cut is measured against.

Improvement cycle · five stagesSwitchback — the path turns at Improve and returns at Learn
01Detect

Path-rework rate rises in a supply slice.

02Diagnose

The path that was cut and took reach with it is checked against every hop and deal until one cause explains it.

03Improve

Version-stamp the change and attach the paths that exposed it.

04Verify

The affected cases run again, and a failure stops the release.

05Learn

It becomes a standing test, and the path rules change with it.

Learn → DetectThe return edge. The next model runs against a suite one case longer.

Typical build scope

Twelve workstreams across six weeks

The build scope read against the delivery timeline. Week structure follows the six-week plan — discovery, sources, path-mapping workflow, evaluation, integration, then production validation and handover.

Workstream Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6
01Desk discovery and boundary definition and it is logged..
02DSP, SSP and curator source assessment.
03Fee and curator-conflict rule mapping and rule mapping.
04Path intake and deal-ID normalisation.
05Path-mapping logic and fee attribution.
06Confidence scoring and reach routing.
07Buyer approval workflow.
08DSP and SSP integration.
09Path and reach regression cases.
10Guardrails and cutover controls.
11Deal-trail instrumentation.
12Deployment, documentation and Agent Care handover.
12 workstreams · 6 weeks · bar shows the weeks a workstream is active — several run in parallel Final scope and sequence confirmed in discovery

Engagement tiers

What each tier includes

Rows are the capabilities named in each tier's scope. Higher tiers include everything below them.

Capability✓ in scope · — not at this tier PilotOne desk, one DSP seat ProductionProduction DSP and SSP access AdvancedMultiple markets / brands
Introduced at Pilot
Path mapping to your rules
Buyer approval
Fee-visibility baseline
Introduced at Production
Reporting by supply path
Escalation workflow in your tools
Approved cutover actions
DSP and SSP integration
Introduced at Advanced
Multi-market curator rules
Multi-stage desk approvals
High path volume
Multi-market path controls
Build price From $5,000 From $8,000 Custom quote
Final build priceConfirmed after discovery based on integrations, workflow complexity, transaction volume, approval controls and deployment requirements.
Separate from buildBuild pricing is separate from recurring Agent Care, which covers managed monitoring, evaluations, incidents and verified improvements after launch.

What we need from you

What you bring, and what we build with it

Each input maps to a piece of build scope and a week in the delivery timeline.

You bringWe build with it
01Your DSP seat list and current SSP / curator setup Path ingestion and deal-ID mappingWeek 1
02Representative path and fee history Path-mapping baseline and fee attributionWeek 2
03Your fee-visibility and curator-conflict rules Fee-visibility and approval-boundary mappingWeek 1
04Access to relevant APIs, feeds or exports DSP and SSP assessment, then integration setupWeek 2
05Paths you would not want cut Reach cases and the evaluation suiteWeek 4
06What no path may be cut without Confidence scoring, reach routing, guardrails and approval controlsWeek 3
07Named buyers to review path changes Buyer approval workflow, then pilot and production validationWeeks 5–6
Nothing else is required Deployment, documentation and Agent Care handover are ours.

Delivery timeline

Four phases across six weeks

The phases are drawn on the weeks they occupy, so week 5 genuinely doubles rather than padding the plan.

Phase W1W2W3W4W5W6
Discovery W1
Build W2 – W3
Evaluate W4 – W5
Pilot & Launch W5 – W6
Week focus W1Desk discovery, fee-rule mapping and the automation boundary W2Source integration and the path-mapping baseline W3Path-mapping workflow, confidence logic and approval controls W4Evaluation suite, guardrails and failure-mode testing W5DSP and SSP integration, pilot paths and targeted corrections W6One buying cycle run under the programmatic lead, then Agent Care handover
Reading the bandA bar covers only the weeks its work is named in — the week 5 overlap is real, not padding.
At the end of W6The final checks clear on live paths and monitoring moves to Agent Care.
DurationSix-week plan shown · typical delivery 4–6 weeks depending on scope confirmed in discovery.

Next step · Advertising AI agent

Build a supply-path agent around your trading desk's approval chain.

Show us your DSP seats, your SSP and curator list, and who signs off on a cut. Not a lower blended number. A mapped path, its visible fees and the reach a cut would cost — named before the buyer approves it.

Nestack Agents · Supply-path optimisation & curationAGT-AM-14 · Agent Care available after launch