Nestack Agent Care

Strategy AI agent · M&A deal filings

M&A Deal Filing AI Agent

Corral the deal record out of the drafts, mailboxes and drives it scattered into, test each answer against the document behind it, and hold the assembled file for the officer who signs.

4–6 weeksTypical delivery
Your stackDeployment
Two filingsTwo oaths
Agent CareAfter launch

What this agent does

Assembles the filing, never the certification

In
01

A deal is signed, and § 803.6 gives the certification to an officer or director.

02

A waiting period opens, and 15 U.S.C. § 18a(b)(1) runs thirty days from receipt.

Reason
03

A cash tender offer or a bankruptcy sale runs fifteen days under § 803.10.

04

A Second Request lands, and § 803.6(b) puts a fresh certification on the response.

05

A filing is pulled, and § 803.12 wants it recertified within two business days.

Decide
06

A covered transaction approaches, and § 800.401(g)(2) sets thirty days before completion.

07

A declaration is filed, and § 800.405(b) starts thirty days of assessment.

Out
08

A notifiable outbound deal completes, and § 850.404(c) leaves thirty calendar days.

09

Execute write actions only inside the approval boundaries agreed during implementation.

Product statement

Assembly and both clocks belong to the agent. An officer or director certifies the HSR filing; the chief executive or a duly authorized designee certifies the CFIUS one.

Example workflow

One filing, evidence to certification

AgentHuman
1Deal documents receivedDraft decks, bankers' models, board papers or custodian mailboxes
2Filing context assembledThe transaction, the parties standing behind it, the regime it answers to and the day its clock started
3Answer evidence draftedThe question, the documents under it, the gaps and completeness
4Controls appliedCustodian checks, de-duplication checks, clock checks and completeness confidence
No human action required

Stages 1 to 4 run unaided, and no certification happens at any of them — the agent is only assembling, and counsel enters at the completeness gate.

5DecisionSplits at the completeness gate
Evidence sufficient

Passes to the certifying officer for signature.

Anything thin

Adds a deal counsel read first.

Counsel review

The filing is held with its answers, its gaps and the custodians they came from.

Certify · Append evidence · Send to counsel review
Certified — by an officer or director
6Deal and filing records updatedOnly where write access and records policy allow it
7Outcome evaluatedDocument completeness, clock coverage, counsel corrections and what review found
Corrections

Each counsel correction is counted in the evaluation.

What should not run autonomously

Human approval stays in control

Outside the boundary — human approval required8 items
Certifying an HSR filing under 16 CFR § 803.6.
Signing the § 800.204 certification for a party.
Deciding that a document is not responsive.
Choosing who holds actual authority to sign.
Automation boundaryAgent acts unaided
Build the custodian map from the officers and directors named.
Collect and de-duplicate the deal documents held.
Run both clocks and raise the two-business-day recertification.
Test every drafted answer against the document held.
No certification is signed and no filing goes out except by a named person, on approval.
Judging whether a transaction is reportable.
Telling an agency the filing is complete.
Predicting whether early termination will be granted.
Changes to the filing, the log or the custodian map.

Example output

One filing answer, annotated

Our deal-underwriting due-diligence copilot reconciles asset-level financials for a discretionary investment committee; this assembles sworn narrative evidence for a government filing on a statutory clock.

Filing answer · single questionIllustrative example
Answer
Recorded as
Question
Evidence of record
Confidence
Held for
Competitive overlap, Item 4(c)
Drawn from the documents each custodian named
Overlap narrative
Board paper, 3 August 2026
Held uncertified
The certifying officer, by name
As receivedTaken from the board papers and the custodian mailboxes — it reaches no further than those sources.
What the record holds Board paper Bankers' model Draft strategy deck
Why nothing is sworn hereWhether the file is true, correct, and complete is a sworn judgement.
ActionCertifyAppend evidenceSend to counsel review
What the score decidesBelow the configured threshold a filing picks up a counsel read before the officer sees it.

Value

Where AI adds value

The same four claims, placed at the point in the workflow where each one applies.

Where the value landsValue 01 – 04
Every answerFrom the custodian who holds it
03Evidence

Where the evidence is used

A filing record is not a legal opinion: this page shows what was collected and what each answer rests on, and it makes no call on whether a deal is reportable.

01Approved path

One deal, several oaths

The HSR certification is notarised or made under penalty of perjury per 28 U.S.C. § 1746; CFIUS and outbound run under 18 U.S.C. § 1001.

02Human review

What was checked, and not found

The presidential decision window is statutory and does not sit in Part 800, so it is not stated here; no CFIUS fee or penalty figure is published on this page; and the declaration wording of the EU Form CO and Form FS-CO could not be retrieved verbatim, so neither is quoted.

04Build an evidence trail

The filing, the document behind each answer and the officer who certified stay together.

Integrations

Typical integrations

Five system groups connect to the same agent. Which of them are in scope is decided in discovery.

Deal team and custodiansMailboxes · shared drives
Draft decks and deal-team files
Board and governanceBoard portal · minute book
Board papers and resolutions
Corporate structureCap table · entity register
Ownership and control records

Agent

M&A deal filing evidence

Reads the requests
Assembles the file
Holds for the officer

Advisers and data roomsBankers · counsel · data room
Models, drafts and exhibit lists
Observability & evaluationOpenTelemetry · Langfuse
Supported monitoring/evaluation sources

Integration availability depends on the client's existing systems and API access.

Agent controls

Six turnstiles between the model and the officer

Six turnstiles in a row, the last admitting fewest. Whoever passes them all is named in the map below.

L6 · Outermost — last line of defenceInward → L1 · closest to the model
L6Rollback / safe modeNarrow the agent to evidence assembly when evaluation or production signals degrade.Roll back
L5Version monitoringTrack model, prompt and filing rules; the 2024 HSR form was vacated on 12 February 2026, and § 803.6, whose amendment history stops in 1983, was untouched by it.Track
L4TraceabilityRecord each answer, the documents under it, the custodian it came from and every read of the file.Record
L3Officer releaseHold the file for an officer or director possessing actual authority under § 803.6(c); the hold governs release, not whether an answer is complete.Gate
L2Custodian guardrailsTest the collection against the named custodians and the request; § 800.404(d) and § 800.502 make each party certify its own submission separately.Restrict
L1Confidence thresholdsRoute a thin filing to a counsel read first; § 800.508 allows forty-five days of investigation and a single extension of fifteen.Require review
Model coreEvidence assembled — the answer, its documents, the clocks and completeness
L1 – L2Test whether an answer may stand
L3Leaves the certification to a named person
L4 – L5Keep the filing and the document behind it
L6Holds the filing uncertified when signals degrade

How Nestack evaluates it

Evaluate the whole assembly — not only the filing answer that comes out.

Coverage runs the whole depth of the workflow, and every layer is cut by slice.

Surface — the filing an agency reads
Depth of coverage ▼
E1Final-output evaluationDid the answer record what the documents actually show?
E2Step-level evaluationDid the agent read the right custodian, the right request and the live entity list?
E3Tool evaluationDid it read and write the correct deal record and the correct filing?
E4Confidence calibrationDo low-confidence filings actually attract more counsel corrections?
E5Slice evaluationHow does performance change across specific filing types?
E6Business outcomeHow many filings needed a correction before the officer certified?
Floor — the filing the company answers for

Failure modes

Where each failure originates in the agent

Seven failure modes, each pinned to the stage where it first shows.

Agent lifecycleDirection of processing →
01 · Retrieval1 mode
LT-03

Stale custodian read

The custodian list is not the one the deal team now works to.

Stage gathersThe deals, the requests, the drafts and the dates
02 · Reasoning2 modes
LT-04

Answer asserted, not shown

An answer is drafted with no document under it.

LT-06

Vacated form read as live

A withdrawn form is worked as the operative one.

Stage proposesThe answers, their documents and completeness
03 · Tool / write2 modes
LT-02

Thin filing passed forward

A filing moves on without the counsel read.

LT-05

Wrong party on the document

The document is bound to the other side of the deal.

Stage writesOnly where write access and approval policy allow it
04 · Output1 mode
LT-01

Sworn, evidence unrecorded

The file shows a signature but not the documents under it.

Stage returnsThe filing an officer signs and an agency reads
05 · Change / Version1 mode
LT-07

Silent deadline drift

A release shifts the deadline while the filing keeps the old one.

Stage tracksModel, prompt, filing rules and answer fields
Sev-1 · a filing certified on no document Sev-2 · wrong document reaches the filing Sev-3 · source degrades, filing held back

Affected slices

Second Request responses absorb the corrections

A filing-level document-completeness figure can read clean while Second Request responses carry most of the rework. Nestack reports the correction rate by filing type, not only in total.

Slice performance — reported separately, not only in aggregateIllustrative example
SliceFailure rateLift Lift vs. thresholdStatus
Second Request responses11.1%3.7× Review
Initial HSR notifications7.9%2.6× Review
CFIUS declarations and notices4.9%1.6× Watch
Outbound notifications1.9%0.6× Normal
Bar: correction-rate lift vs. outbound notification baseline · scale 0–4.0× · tick marks the 2.0× review threshold 2 of 4 slices over threshold

Evidence-linked improvement

What a missed document costs

A loop ends when the missed deal document has become a case the next release must pass. That suite is what the next filing assembled is measured against.

Improvement cycle · five stagesSwitchback — the path turns at Improve and returns at Learn
01Detect

Correction rate rises on Second Request responses.

02Diagnose

The deal folder on one director's laptop that the sworn filing said did not exist is read back until a single cause remains.

03Improve

Number the change; the filings that drove it are filed underneath it.

04Verify

Each touched filing case is run once more, and one red holds it back.

05Learn

It stays on as a standing test, and the collection rules travel with it.

Learn → DetectThe return edge. The next filing is measured against a suite one case longer.

Typical build scope

Twelve workstreams across six weeks

The build scope read against the delivery timeline. Week structure follows the six-week plan — discovery, sources, filing assembly, evaluation, integration, then production validation and handover.

Workstream Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6
01Certification-boundary and custodian-map work.
02Custodian, board and adviser sources.
03Answer-to-document and clock-coverage mapping.
04Deal document ingestion.
05Answer, document and party binding.
06Completeness scoring and review routing.
07Officer certification workflow.
08Data-room and mailbox integration.
09Custodian and completeness cases.
10Guardrails and certification controls.
11Filing-trail instrumentation.
12Deployment, documentation and Agent Care handover.
12 workstreams · 6 weeks · bar shows the weeks a workstream is active — several run in parallel Final scope and sequence confirmed in discovery

Engagement tiers

What each tier includes

Rows are the capabilities named in each tier's scope. Higher tiers include everything below them.

Capability✓ in scope · — not at this tier PilotOne deal, one regime ProductionProduction filing workflow AdvancedMultiple regimes / entities
Introduced at Pilot
Answer assembly to your requests
Certifying officer release
Deal-document baseline
Introduced at Production
Reporting by filing
Officer sign-off workflow in your systems
Approved write-back
Custodian-mailbox integration
Introduced at Advanced
Multi-party filings
Cross-regime evidence packs
Large document estates
Multi-regime deadline controls
Build price From $5,000 From $8,000 Custom quote
Final build priceConfirmed after discovery based on integrations, workflow complexity, document volume, approval controls and deployment requirements.
Separate from buildBuild pricing is separate from recurring Agent Care, which covers managed monitoring, evaluations, incidents and verified improvements after launch.

What we need from you

What you bring, and what we build with it

Each input maps to a piece of build scope and a week in the delivery timeline.

You bringWe build with it
01Your live deals and the custodians behind each one Custodian mapping and document captureWeek 1
02Representative board, adviser and deal-team documents Document binding, answer logic and the filing baselineWeek 2
03Your standing filing procedure and the signers it names Request mapping, clock binding and the automation boundaryWeek 1
04Access to relevant APIs, feeds or exports Custodian, board and adviser source assessment, then integration setupWeek 2
05Filings you would not want sworn Completeness cases and the evaluation runWeek 4
06What no filing record may settle Completeness scoring, review routing, guardrails and release controlsWeek 3
07An officer or director who possesses actual authority Release to the certifying officer, then pilot and production validationWeeks 5–6
Nothing else is required Deployment, documentation and Agent Care handover are ours.

Delivery timeline

Four phases across six weeks

Phase widths follow the effort each one costs rather than the grid, so one week does double duty.

Phase W1W2W3W4W5W6
Discovery W1
Build W2 – W3
Evaluate W4 – W5
Pilot & Launch W5 – W6
Week focus W1Filing workflow discovery, custodian mapping and the automation boundary W2Source integration and the deal-document baseline W3Answer assembly, clock logic and release controls W4Evaluation suite, completeness cases and failure-mode testing W5Data-room integration, pilot filings and targeted corrections W6One deal cycle run under the certifying officer, then Agent Care handover
Reading the bandEach bar spans the weeks its own work is named for, and the fifth holds two because the work does.
At the end of W6When the filing record validates, Agent Care takes the agent on.
DurationSix-week plan shown · typical delivery 4–6 weeks depending on scope confirmed in discovery.

Next step · Strategy AI agent

Build a deal filing agent around the document nobody remembered writing.

Show us one answer and the document under it. Only § 803.6 says who certifies an HSR filing: any officer or director of the filing person, possessing actual authority. Under § 800.204 and § 850.203 it is the chief executive or a duly authorized designee.

Nestack Agents · M&A deal filingsAGT-CS-02 · Agent Care available after launch